Skip to main content

Election Denial in Hawai‘i

  • 1 Election Denier currently holds statewide office with election oversight power.

  • 1 Election Denier has held, or run for, statewide office since 2020.

  • 0 Election Deniers are sitting members of Congress.

The landscape in Hawai‘i

In most states, the top election official is the Secretary of State. Hawai‘i is an exception: The chief election official is appointed by the Hawai‘i Elections Commission. One member of that commission, Kahiolani Papalimu, has used the platform to amplify election conspiracy theories.

On Jan. 6, 2021, Papalimu reposted a letter from the state Republican Party chair asking Vice President Mike Pence to reject electors from six states carried by Joe Biden—authority that Pence does not have under the Constitution.

More than two years later, Hawaii Republicans lost a court case claiming that state election officials violated the law during the routine auditing process that followed the 2022 election. The defendants in the case, the state Office of Elections and Chief Elections Officer Scott Nago, said those assertions were “pure speculation.” A judge dismissed the case, one of many election challenges that have failed in Hawaii courts.

1 Election Denier holds statewide Office right now.

Elections are run by the states. In Hawai'i, the Governor, Attorney General, and chief election official are the state officials responsible for overseeing elections. In most states, the Secretary of State is the chief election official. Hawai'i is an exception: The Hawai'i Elections Commission appoints the chief election official. It’s up to all of them to make sure the will of the people is always respected.

Read more about The Roles of Our Elected Officials in Elections

All parties
Election Deniers
Headshot of Kahiolani Papalimu
R
Kahiolani Papalimu

State Elections Board of Hawaiʻi

Term started 2020

Term ends 2024

Election Denier
Election Denial Record What makes an Election Denier
  • Spread lies or promoted conspiracies about the legitimacy of the 2020 presidential election or subsequent election cycles in public, including in social media, press statements, or comments to the press.

  • Refused to certify, or called on or pressured election officials to refuse to certify, the 2020 presidential election results or a race in subsequent elections based on meritless claims about election fraud, voter fraud, misinformation, or lies.

  • Falsely claimed former President Trump won the 2020 presidential election instead of the legitimate winner, President Biden.

  • Taken action to undermine the integrity of the 2020 presidential election or subsequent election cycles, including:

    • Filing or supporting litigation seeking to overturn the results based on conspiracies or baseless legal theories.

    • Filing or supporting litigation that was sanctioned for being malicious or without merit in the aftermath of an election.

    • Promoting or participating in a Stop the Steal–sponsored or branded event or rally during or following the 2020 election.

    • Calling for a “forensic audit” of the 2020 presidential election or a race in subsequent elections after the results were certified, were officially audited, or stood up to multiple legal challenges.

  • Refused to concede a race, or publicly supported a candidate’s refusal to concede a race, after the results were officially audited or stood up to multiple legal challenges.

0 Election Deniers are sitting members of congress right now.

Election Deniers make up 0 percent of Hawai‘i’s 4-member Congressional delegation. Members of Congress have a public platform to build up or tear down trust in our elections. And they have concrete responsibilities, too, such as determining federal funding for elections.

Read more about The Roles of Our Elected Officials in Elections

All parties
Election Deniers

No candidates match the selected filters.

How Hawai‘i compares

Every state runs its own elections, with its own laws and processes. Check out how Hawai‘i compares with other states in its region when it comes to Election Deniers holding state election administration jobs.

Election Denial in Far West States

Sitting official is an Election Denier

  1. In Alaska, the chief election official is the Lieutenant Governor, elected alongside the Governor.
  2. In Hawai'i, the Chief Election Official is appointed by the Hawai'i Elections Commission.

1 Election Denier has held, or has run for, statewide Office since 2020.

Even one Election Denier with election oversight power is a threat to the will of the people. Here are the Election Deniers who have sought control over Hawai‘i elections in recent years.

All parties
All
Headshot of Kahiolani Papalimu
R
Kahiolani Papalimu

State Elections Board of Hawaiʻi

Term started 2020

Term ends 2024

Sitting Official
Election Denier
Election Denial Record What makes an Election Denier
  • Spread lies or promoted conspiracies about the legitimacy of the 2020 presidential election or subsequent election cycles in public, including in social media, press statements, or comments to the press.

  • Refused to certify, or called on or pressured election officials to refuse to certify, the 2020 presidential election results or a race in subsequent elections based on meritless claims about election fraud, voter fraud, misinformation, or lies.

  • Falsely claimed former President Trump won the 2020 presidential election instead of the legitimate winner, President Biden.

  • Taken action to undermine the integrity of the 2020 presidential election or subsequent election cycles, including:

    • Filing or supporting litigation seeking to overturn the results based on conspiracies or baseless legal theories.

    • Filing or supporting litigation that was sanctioned for being malicious or without merit in the aftermath of an election.

    • Promoting or participating in a Stop the Steal–sponsored or branded event or rally during or following the 2020 election.

    • Calling for a “forensic audit” of the 2020 presidential election or a race in subsequent elections after the results were certified, were officially audited, or stood up to multiple legal challenges.

  • Refused to concede a race, or publicly supported a candidate’s refusal to concede a race, after the results were officially audited or stood up to multiple legal challenges.

Voter turnout over time

Voters are always the backstop against election denial, whether Election Deniers are already in office or vying for power. It’s important to turn out for every election in your state—and to vote in every race on your ballot. Downballot races, like contests for Attorney General and Secretary of State, have historically drawn fewer voters, even though the positions are critical to keeping elections free, fair, and secure. Here’s a look at voter participation in Hawai‘i elections over time. Notice that in years with several important positions up for election, some voters choose not to vote in every race.

Voter Participation in Hawai‘i Since 2016

#071B40
President
#2455A0
Senator
#4387F1
Governor
#A7C5F3
Attorney General
#EDF3FD
Secretary of State
  1. 2016 Presidential

    • President had a 43% voter turnout rate

    • Senator had a 41% voter turnout rate

  2. 2018 Midterm

    • Senator had a 38% voter turnout rate

    • Governor had a 39% voter turnout rate

  3. 2020 Presidential

    • President had a 56% voter turnout rate

Voter turnout

Data on the number of votes cast in each race are from state elections depositories, supplemented with data from the U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC), House Election Statistics, and The Book of States. Rates are calculated using the Census’s Citizen Voting Age Population (CVAP) estimates.

Beyond the ballot box

Each year, state legislators introduce thousands of bills related to elections. And in the past few years, we’ve identified a concerning trend. Across the country, state legislatures are considering bills that would make it easier for partisan actors to manipulate an election, and maybe even overturn the will of the people. We’re tracking these bills along with our partners in an ongoing series of reports called “A Democracy Crisis in the Making.” All told, in the 2023 legislative cycle, we identified 196 bills that were introduced in 39 states that would interfere with election administration. Ultimately, 21 of those bills became law across 15 states, while 7 bills were vetoed across 2 states.

The anti-democracy playbook is simple: change the rules and change the referees, in order to change the results. These bills go hand-in-hand with the Election Denier movement: They’re about taking power away from voters and making it harder for trusted election officials to do their jobs.

Read the full report

Legislative Interference in Hawai‘i by Category

As of November 15, 2023, no bills had been introduced or were under consideration in Hawai‘i. None have been enacted or adopted and none have been vetoed after passing.

  • Usurping control over election results.
    These bills would give legislators or other state officials direct control over election outcomes.
  • Requiring partisan or unprofessional election “audits” or reviews.
    These bills would establish vague post-election review schemes without the professional standards of traditional audits.
  • Seizing power over election responsibilities.
    These bills would shift election administration responsibilities away from professional, nonpartisan officials and toward partisan actors in the legislature.
  • Creating unworkable burdens in election administration.
    These bills would interfere with the basic procedures of election administration, increasing the risk of chaos and delay and enabling misleading claims of irregularity.
  • Imposing disproportionate criminal or other penalties.
    These bills would create or expand penalties for election officials in the ordinary execution of their jobs, including criminalizing inadvertent mistakes.